1 00:00:06,750 --> 00:00:09,660 Candace Maracle: Now in this last video, I'm gonna be talking 2 00:00:09,660 --> 00:00:12,210 about how best to get in touch with people in Indigenous 3 00:00:12,210 --> 00:00:16,920 communities, how to get those interviews, and what to do, what 4 00:00:16,920 --> 00:00:20,610 kinds of questions to ask, once you're sitting with your 5 00:00:20,610 --> 00:00:24,420 interviewee. I remember when I was working at CBC and one of 6 00:00:24,420 --> 00:00:27,570 the colleagues looked over to me and said that I was probably one 7 00:00:27,570 --> 00:00:29,850 of the most dogged chased producers she'd ever worked 8 00:00:29,850 --> 00:00:34,290 with. I was trying to chase down someone in Attawapiskat, for a 9 00:00:34,290 --> 00:00:39,600 story I was doing on the people who had been first approved to 10 00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:43,080 get the house on this long wait list of people who actually were 11 00:00:43,080 --> 00:00:49,590 in urgent need. They didn't have running water in some cases, or 12 00:00:49,590 --> 00:00:55,560 plumbing or hydro, let alone an easy way to reach them. Which 13 00:00:55,560 --> 00:01:01,530 brings me to my second point is for journalists, we tend to get 14 00:01:01,530 --> 00:01:05,790 a little bit lazing. And I think it's really important if we want 15 00:01:05,790 --> 00:01:09,420 to get the best story and put it out there for all to consume, 16 00:01:09,720 --> 00:01:12,570 that we want to be really dogged in our search for the best 17 00:01:12,570 --> 00:01:16,980 guest. It's very easy for us to fall back on that contact list 18 00:01:17,910 --> 00:01:21,210 in the interest of time and deadlines, and to reach out for 19 00:01:21,210 --> 00:01:24,930 the first person that we that we're familiar with. But in this 20 00:01:24,930 --> 00:01:28,410 way, our stories tend to be kind of narrow, or at least the scope 21 00:01:28,410 --> 00:01:33,450 of them. And I think we would do well to get the Indigenous voice 22 00:01:33,450 --> 00:01:36,450 that's not often heard that kind of perspective that we don't 23 00:01:36,450 --> 00:01:40,110 often get to hear from or see. The person who's not a chief 24 00:01:40,320 --> 00:01:45,360 actually had a film critic, talk to me about my movie, critique 25 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:50,640 my movie, before I had applied the titles to it, and assumed 26 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:54,330 that every person I had interviewed was a chief. The 27 00:01:54,330 --> 00:01:57,600 people in our communities with the strongest and best voice for 28 00:01:57,600 --> 00:02:03,960 your story might not necessarily be the chief or band Council. We 29 00:02:03,960 --> 00:02:08,040 have a lot of untapped wisdom in our communities. And reaching 30 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:10,890 out to someone just by doing a little bit of extra digging 31 00:02:11,130 --> 00:02:14,160 would help bring a really fresh and unique perspective to your 32 00:02:14,160 --> 00:02:17,940 story. One of the other points that I want to make is that I 33 00:02:17,940 --> 00:02:21,720 think your assumptions are best left at the door, at least to be 34 00:02:21,780 --> 00:02:25,590 aware of your personal biases, and everyone has them, even 35 00:02:25,590 --> 00:02:28,590 though we might like to think that we don't. We do. If you've 36 00:02:28,590 --> 00:02:31,110 never had an addict in your family, it's going to be very 37 00:02:31,110 --> 00:02:34,350 difficult for you to be able to relate to one in reference to 38 00:02:34,350 --> 00:02:38,700 your story. Be accountable. If I intend to work with a community 39 00:02:38,700 --> 00:02:42,240 again, or cover a story or an issue that's going on within 40 00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:45,150 that community, I had better make sure that I'm going to be 41 00:02:45,150 --> 00:02:48,990 accountable in some way to that community. A simple follow up 42 00:02:48,990 --> 00:02:53,430 call or an email will do. But what I've experienced is that 43 00:02:53,430 --> 00:02:58,050 some communities are quite reluctant to give interviews if 44 00:02:58,050 --> 00:03:01,830 they've already been poorly depicted in media. This makes it 45 00:03:01,830 --> 00:03:04,800 really hard for journalists to do our jobs, because some 46 00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:08,910 journalists maybe didn't do this very well. While I'm doing the 47 00:03:08,910 --> 00:03:15,030 story, I might ask myself, will the community consider it to be 48 00:03:15,030 --> 00:03:17,610 an accurate depiction of what's actually going on with this 49 00:03:17,610 --> 00:03:21,390 community? Or is it more sensational? Will it contribute 50 00:03:21,390 --> 00:03:25,140 to a greater awareness? Or will it trigger anger and hostility, 51 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:28,152 Lindsay Monture: There was always these cameras and stuff 52 00:03:28,226 --> 00:03:32,803 around there would always be on the other side of the barrier. 53 00:03:32,877 --> 00:03:37,233 And they're kind of always covering from the Caledonia side 54 00:03:37,306 --> 00:03:41,957 of things and verybody was, like kind of excited to see that we 55 00:03:42,031 --> 00:03:46,756 were on the news, but also kind of I don't know, I felt a lot of 56 00:03:46,830 --> 00:03:51,259 times it turned sour for us, because of the way that we were 57 00:03:51,333 --> 00:03:56,131 being represented, how the story wasn't, wasn't really, it seemed 58 00:03:56,205 --> 00:04:00,635 like a lot of things were out of context, you know, and they 59 00:04:00,708 --> 00:04:04,769 didn't get the full story or like the history about the 60 00:04:04,842 --> 00:04:09,420 Haldimand Tract treaty, and why this is all happening. They're 61 00:04:09,493 --> 00:04:13,923 just kind of shooting all the chaos and stuff that was going 62 00:04:13,997 --> 00:04:18,204 on. Without giving it that context, and really taking the 63 00:04:18,278 --> 00:04:22,634 opportunity if you're telling the story to actually educate 64 00:04:22,708 --> 00:04:26,989 the viewers about why this is happening. How did it get to 65 00:04:27,063 --> 00:04:31,714 this point, you know, and what we hope to happen from here, you 66 00:04:31,788 --> 00:04:36,217 know, and what are what are Canadians responsibility in this 67 00:04:36,291 --> 00:04:40,794 situation too? Right, it's not just an isolated situation for 68 00:04:40,868 --> 00:04:45,224 you know, people in Caledonia and for us. You know, this is 69 00:04:45,298 --> 00:04:49,579 all over Canada. They need to look at what land whose land 70 00:04:49,653 --> 00:04:54,452 they're on and what are the laws of that land. You know, what are 71 00:04:54,525 --> 00:04:58,733 the treaties set in place and the agreements made between 72 00:04:58,807 --> 00:05:01,170 Canadians and Indigenous people?